5 Essential Anti Multi-Accounting Tactics for Web3, Crypto Devs & Users
Multi-accounting has become a significant challenge for the Web3 and cryptocurrency ecosystem. Fraudsters use multiple accounts to manipulate the market, exploit platform vulnerabilities, or gain an unfair advantage over other users. This practice undermines platform security, erodes user trust, and compromises the integrity of the ecosystem. In order to protect their users and maintain a level playing field, developers and operators in the Web3 and cryptocurrency space must adopt a proactive approach to tackling this issue. In this article, we present five essential strategies that can help prevent multi-accounting, ensuring the safety and longevity of your platform, products, or services.
The increasing sophistication of attackers requires an equally sophisticated response. Web3 and crypto platforms must be well-equipped with the latest tools and techniques to detect and deter such fraudulent activities. Establishing robust security protocols will not only help maintain the sound operation of your platform but will also enhance your reputation and user trust among your target audience. By implementing proper anti-multi-accounting measures, you can prevent potential damage to your user community and your platform's value.
The upcoming sections will explore the top 5 strategies for preventing multi-accounting in the Web3 and cryptocurrency landscape, including Bot Behavior Biometrics AI, Device and Browser Fingerprinting, KYC Procedures, Headless Browser and Automation Framework Detection, and Network Fingerprinting and VPN, Proxy, Datacenter Detections. Each tactic has its own advantages, disadvantages, and specific considerations for implementation, which we will comprehensively discuss. These strategies, when employed singly or in combination, will significantly reduce the risks associated with fraudulent multi-accounting activities, helping you ensure a secure and trustworthy environment for your users and stakeholders.
In conclusion, addressing the challenge of multi-accounting is essential in maintaining the integrity of the Web3 and cryptocurrency ecosystem. Developers and platform operators must stay informed about evolving trends and threats in the digital landscape and implement a variety of anti-fraud techniques to safeguard their platforms against malicious actors. By incorporating a multi-layered approach and keeping up to date with emerging technologies, you can effectively combat fraudulent activities and create a safe and secure platform, fostering user trust, and promoting the long-term sustainability of your projects.
Strategy 1: Bot Behavior Biometrics AI
What is Bot Behavior Biometrics AI
Bot Behavior Biometrics AI utilizes artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to analyze user interactions on Web3 and cryptocurrency platforms, focusing on identifying patterns consistent with non-human, automated activities (bots). This security technology helps detect and deter fraudulent attempts by malicious actors who use multiple accounts to exploit vulnerabilities or manipulate systems.
How it works
- Analyzing user interactions: The AI algorithms monitor user interactions on the platform, such as mouse movements, keyboard strokes, and click patterns.
- Comparing patterns to known human and bot behaviors: The analyzed data is compared to a database of known human and bot behaviors, determining whether the user interaction patterns align more closely with human or automated activities.
Pros & Cons
-
Pros:
- Efficient detection of bot-based multi-accounting schemes: Bot Behavior Biometrics AI can quickly and accurately identify potential multi-accounting attempts driven by bots. This helps maintain fairness, protect user trust, and secure the platform's overall ecosystem.
- Continuous learning and improvement: AI algorithms are designed to improve over time as more data is processed, increasing the accuracy and effectiveness of detection.
-
Cons:
- May have some false positives/negatives: Although AI is highly accurate, some false positives or negatives can occur during the identification process. False positives may impact legitimate users, while false negatives would allow some bot activities to go undetected.
Implementation
-
Choosing an AI-based solution provider: Research and evaluate different AI-based biometric solution providers to identify the ones offering the most robust and accurate detection tools. Consider factors such as the company's reputation, their technology's false-positive and false-negative rates, and the level of customization offered.
-
Integrating with the platform's user interaction data: Once you have selected a Bot Behavior Biometrics AI provider, work with them to integrate the technology into your platform's existing user interaction data systems. Ensure that the solution adequately covers the scope of user interactions on your platform.
-
Regularly updating behavioral patterns: Ensure that the AI algorithms are updated with the latest known human and bot behavior patterns, allowing the system to continue detecting and mitigating multi-accounting fraud effectively. Stay informed about emerging techniques and technologies in the cybersecurity landscape to improve detection capabilities continuously.
Strategy 2: Device and Browser Fingerprinting
What is Device and Browser Fingerprinting
Device and browser fingerprinting is a technique used to identify users by creating a unique profile based on their device and browser attributes. This method gathers information about the user's device, such as the operating system, installed plugins, screen resolution, and more. By analyzing this data, it becomes possible to differentiate users and detect irregularities indicative of multi-accounting schemes.
How it works
- Creating unique user profiles based on device/browser attributes: When a user accesses a Web3 or cryptocurrency platform, their device and browser details are collected and analyzed to create a unique fingerprint.
- Detecting irregularities in multiple accounts with similar profiles: By comparing fingerprints, it's possible to identify multiple accounts with similar device and browser characteristics, which may indicate fraudulent multi-accounting activity.
Pros & Cons
Pros:
- Robust detection of multi-accounting fraudsters: Device and browser fingerprinting provides a high level of accuracy in identifying accounts created to conduct fraud, as it's difficult to manipulate device and browser characteristics consistently.
Cons:
- Privacy concerns: Collecting device and browser information may raise concerns about user privacy, and some jurisdictions implement strict legal requirements around data collection.
- Potential for fingerprint spoofing: Advanced fraudsters may attempt to spoof device and browser fingerprints by employing techniques that modify the information collected.
Implementation
-
Employing device fingerprinting libraries: Choose a reputable device fingerprinting library or solution provider that supports the data collection and analysis required to track unique device/browser fingerprints. Some popular choices include FingerprintJS, validd.io, and ThreatMetrix.
-
Monitoring account creation and user behavior on the platform: With fingerprinting in place, monitor the data collected, and analyze it for accounts exhibiting similar device/browser profiles. Flag accounts with strong fingerprint similarities that may warrant further investigation. Remember to regularly check and re-evaluate user profiles, as changes in devices and browser configurations are normal for legitimate users.
-
Regularly updating fingerprint data repository: Ensure that the fingerprint data repository is updated regularly to accommodate changes in the device landscape and to keep pace with evolving fraud techniques. This may include adding new data points to the fingerprinting process or refining detection algorithms to improve accuracy.
By implementing device and browser fingerprinting as part of your anti multi-accounting strategy, you'll be in a strong position to detect and prevent fraudulent activity happening on your Web3 or cryptocurrency platforms. Remember to stay current with the latest advancements in fingerprinting technology and consider combining this strategy with others to create a comprehensive and robust approach to fighting multi-accounting fraud.
Get started with Verisoul for free
Strategy 3: KYC Procedures
What is KYC
Know Your Customer (KYC) is a process that businesses use to verify the identities of their customers or users to prevent fraud, specifically multi-accounting, money laundering, and other illegal activities. It serves as a crucial security measure in the Web3 and cryptocurrency ecosystem, ensuring that each user is unique and genuine, thereby reducing the occurrence of multiple accounts tied to a single person or entity.
How it works
KYC procedures involve the collection and verification of user information, typically requiring users to submit proof of identity such as a government-issued ID, passport, or driver's license, alongside facial or biometric scans. Some KYC processes may also include additional checks like address verification, user risk assessment, and transaction monitoring. Ensuring that users have a unique, authenticated, and verified identity can effectively prevent or at least radically reduce multi-accounting.
Pros & Cons
Pros:
-
Effective reduction of multi-account fraud: KYC procedures can drastically reduce the prevalence of multi-accounting by ensuring a unique identity per user. By requiring individuals to submit proof of their identity, it becomes challenging for users to create multiple accounts, as they would need to provide different ID proofs for each.
-
Compliance with regulatory requirements: In many jurisdictions, KYC procedures are mandated by law, especially for financial institutions and cryptocurrency platforms. Implementing KYC helps businesses stay compliant with regulatory requirements while simultaneously combatting fraud.
Cons:
-
User friction at onboarding: Implementing KYC may introduce user friction during account creation or onboarding, as users are required to provide additional identity documentation. This may lead to some users abandoning the platform, potentially reducing user adoption and growth.
-
Potential delays in verification: Depending on the KYC solution, there may be some delays in verifying user information, which may cause inconvenience to users and again hinder platform adoption or usage.
Implementation
-
Implement KYC requirements for new users: To integrate KYC procedures into your platform, start by determining the necessary identity verification requirements for new users. These requirements should comply with your jurisdiction's regulations and meet your business's specific risk management needs.
-
Integration with ID verification solutions: Choose from various KYC solution providers that offer services for identity document verification, facial biometrics, address verification, and more. Some providers offer API integrations or software-as-a-service (SaaS) platforms to implement their KYC solutions into your system seamlessly.
-
Ongoing user risk assessment: Apart from the initial identity verification process, KYC also involves continuous monitoring and risk assessment of users to detect suspicious activities and potential fraud. Employ transaction monitoring, user behavior analysis, and anomaly detection tools to obtain a holistic view of your platform's security and to maintain accurate user profiles.
By employing KYC procedures, your Web3 and cryptocurrency platform can effectively deter multi-accounting fraudsters and contribute to a safer, more reliable ecosystem for all users.
Strategy 4: Headless Browser and Automation Framework Detection
What is Headless Browser and Automation Framework Detection
Headless browsers are web browsers without a graphical user interface (GUI) that automates browser actions and web navigation. They are often used by developers for testing websites and web apps but can also be exploited by bad actors to manipulate web pages, scrape data, or generate multiple fake accounts. Automation frameworks are tools that enable the scripting, execution, and management of automated tasks. Cybercriminals can use these frameworks to simplify and accelerate multi-accounting activities across different platforms.
Detecting the use of headless browsers and automation frameworks helps to uncover accounts created through automated means, allowing the platform to flag or block them before they can cause damage.
How it Works
-
Detecting usage of headless browsers and automation frameworks: In order to identify accounts that use headless browsers, platforms must analyze user-agent strings and detect other telltale signs specific to these tools.
-
Monitoring suspicious account generation and platform interaction: By detecting and analyzing anomalies in user behavior or account creation patterns that could imply automation, platforms can identify potential fraudulent accounts.
Pros & Cons
-
Pros:
-
Uncovering accounts created through automated means: By detecting headless browsers and automation framework usage, platforms can identify and block fraudulent accounts before they can be used to manipulate the ecosystem.
-
Enhanced security against web scraping and data theft: Proactively detecting the use of headless browsers can help protect sensitive information from being scraped or stolen.
-
-
Cons:
-
Evolving sophistication of automated tools may bypass detection: As perpetrators develop more advanced methods to evade detection, it becomes crucial for platforms to stay informed about new techniques and continuously update their detection mechanisms.
-
Possible false positives: Legitimate developers using headless browsers for testing purposes may be inadvertently flagged as malicious actors, leading to temporary blocks or other inconveniences.
-
Implementation
-
Employing headless browser detection libraries: Developers can utilize existing libraries and APIs that provide headless browser detection capabilities, such as Puppeteer, Selenium, or htmlUnit. These libraries need to be integrated into the platform's security infrastructure to monitor user interactions at scale.
-
Monitoring user agents for signs of automation framework usage: Continuously analyzing user-agent strings for known patterns associated with headless browsers or automation frameworks can help identify potential fraudulent accounts. This requires the platform to maintain a database of known user-agent strings and comparison algorithms that adapt to new patterns.
-
Regularly updating detection mechanisms to counter new threats: As attackers evolve their strategies to evade detection, it is important for platforms to stay informed about the latest trends and techniques in the cybersecurity landscape. By constantly updating their detection mechanisms, they can minimize the risk of multi-account fraud and other malicious activities driven by headless browsers and automation frameworks.
Strategy 5: Network Fingerprinting and VPN, Proxy, Datacenter Detections
What is Network Fingerprinting and VPN, Proxy, Datacenter Detections
Network fingerprinting is a technique to analyze and classify the network infrastructure and connection metadata of users accessing a platform. By detecting irregularities, VPN connections, proxies, or data center-based connections, this strategy helps identify potential multi-accounting attempts and fraudulent activities. Additionally, it prevents bad actors from using VPNs, proxies, and data center connections to hide their true location or create multiple accounts.
How it works
- Analyzing network infrastructure and connection metadata: Network fingerprinting tracks various metadata elements related to a user's connection, such as IP addresses, port numbers, and protocol type, to identify patterns that may indicate multi-accounting.
- Identifying irregularities, VPNs, proxies, or data-center connections: By comparing the collected metadata to known malicious patterns, legitimate VPN services, public proxy addresses, and data center connections, it becomes easier to determine if an account is genuine or if it's part of a multi-accounting attack.
Pros & Cons
-
Pros: Enhanced detection of attempts to hide user location - Utilizing network fingerprinting and associated detection techniques makes it harder for fraudsters to mask their true location and create multiple accounts.
-
Cons: False positives due to legitimate VPN/proxy/datacenter usage - This strategy may identify some legitimate users connecting through VPNs, proxies, or data centers as suspicious, potentially impacting their user experience and causing inconvenience.
Implementation
-
Deploying network fingerprinting solutions: Integrate existing libraries and solutions, such as MaxMind's GeoIP2 or IP2Location, with your platform to analyze network connection metadata and identify potential threats.
-
Regular monitoring of IP addresses, network patterns & anomalies: Continuously monitor user connections, IP addresses, and network patterns for signs of suspicious activity. Set up alerts when the platform detects irregular patterns or connections known to be associated with multi-account fraud.
-
Adapting detection strategies to evolving network obfuscation technologies: As fraudsters continue to develop new techniques to hide their network connections, it's essential to stay informed on the latest obfuscation trends and update your detection strategies accordingly. This may involve utilizing novel detection algorithms or adjusting thresholds for identifying risky connections.
By incorporating network fingerprinting and VPN, proxy, and data center detections in your anti-multi-accounting strategy, you'll enhance your ability to thwart fraudulent activity and maintain the security and integrity of your Web3 or cryptocurrency platform.
Final Thoughts and Next Steps
In conclusion, the top 5 strategies to prevent multi-accounting for Web3 and Crypto include:
- Bot Behavior Biometrics AI: Efficiently detecting bot-based multi-accounting schemes through the analysis of user interactions and comparison of human and bot behavior patterns.
- Device and Browser Fingerprinting: Creating unique user profiles based on device/browser attributes to detect irregularities in multiple accounts with similar fingerprints.
- KYC Procedures: Requiring proof of identity submission and verification to ensure each user is unique and effectively reduce multi-account fraud.
- Headless Browser and Automation Framework Detection: Monitoring account generation and platform interaction to uncover accounts created through automated means using headless browsers and automation frameworks.
- Network Fingerprinting and VPN, Proxy, Datacenter Detections: Analyzing network infrastructure and connection metadata to identify irregularities, VPNs, proxies, or data-center connections that may be used to hide user location and create multiple accounts.
It is essential for Web3 and crypto developers, platform operators, and end-users to adapt to evolving fraud techniques and incorporate a multi-layered approach to counter multi-accounting fraud. By combining these tactics, you can create a more secure environment for your platform, product, or service and maintain the trust of your users.
Keep in mind that no single strategy will be foolproof; each has its pros and cons, and attackers will continuously find new ways to bypass your security measures. Therefore, it is equally crucial to continuously scrutinize and enhance your security practices while keeping a close eye on emerging threats and advancements in fraud prevention technology.
By ensuring the utmost security and fairness for your Web3 and crypto platforms, you can create a more trustworthy ecosystem that fosters innovation and attracts users, making it a more successful and enjoyable space for all participants. Implement these strategies today to combat multi-accounting and protect your platform from fraudulent activities.